Assignment Prompt Compare and contrast the methods used by Spain and

Prompt Compare and contrast the methods used by Spain and France in creating their North American colonies (remember that North America refers to modern Canada, United States, and Mexico) - Assignment Example The French used the policy of assimilation. They were friendly to the locals and strived to influence a holistic culture change as they absorbed the locals. They developed schools and churches for the locals besides relating with them as their equals. They encouraged the natives to embrace education and their way of life thus becoming their equals. The Spanish on the other hand were harsh to the natives. The Spanish the natives harshly, they used the natives and the African slaves similarly thus creating animosity between them and the natives1. Additionally, the Spanish brutalized those who did not convert thus spreading their culture forcefully throughout the colony. This instigated widespread resistance and rebellion from the natives. Key similarity between the French and he Spanish was their attempt to convert the locals to their culture and way of life. They established missions to help spread their new religions to the locals since this would help harmonize the colonies. Pickett, Margaret F., and Dwayne W. Pickett.  The European Struggle to Settle North America Colonizing Attempts by England, France and Spain, 1521-1608. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co, 2011.

No Topic, Follow the attachment Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

No Topic, Follow the attachment - Assignment Example Companies should work as a team not an organism. Organisms function independently from each other. If the barriers are broken down through communication future problems can be reduced and eliminated. 10. â€Å"Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and targets for the work force asking for zero defects and new levels of productivity. Such exhortations only create adversarial relationships, as the bulk of the causes of low quality and low productivity belong to the system and thus lie beyond the power of the work force†: Instead of requiring unrealistic goals, since all workers and the system are human creation, expectations should reflect a level of breakdown. Instead of quotas, employees should be encouraged to do their best. Rewards and punishments should be based on performance of the worker, not the system or machinery. For example, a broken machine should not impact the employees negatively. Machines wear down and break. Laying off employees or sending them home due to mechanical failure should be the last option. Companies always need to have cleaning, trash removal, or other mundane chores that employees can complete while their machinery is being fixed. If the factory w orkers feel that they are part of team instead of part of the machinery, work can be more productive in a comfortable environment. â€Å"Eliminate work standards (quotas) on the factory floor. Substitute leadership†: Instead of quotas, leaders should be on the factory floor encouraging good work habits. If a leader, manager, or foreman is visible, employees have an incentive to work harder. When seeing an employee talking on a cell phone, or being unproductive a leader can nip it in the bud right then. â€Å"Eliminate management by objective. Eliminate management by numbers, numerical goals. Substitute leadership†: Management that is not seen but heard through dictates, letters, or other means does not impact the employees as much as true leadership